Scientific Methods
Models, laws, and theories
An idea, equation, structure, or system can model the phenomenon you are trying to explain. Scientific models are based on experimentation. Recall from chemistry class the different models of the atom that were in use over time—new models were developed to explain new observations and measurements.
If new data do not fit a model, both are re-examined. Figure 1-6 shows a historical example. If a very well-established model is questioned, physicists might first look at the new data: can anyone reproduce the results? Were there other variables at work? If the new data are born out by subsequent experiments, the theories have to change to reflect the new findings. For example, in the nineteenth century it was believed that linear markings on Mars showed channels, as shown in Figure 1-7a. As telescopes improved, scientists realized that there were no such markings, as shown in Figure 1-7b. In recent times, again with better instruments, scientists have found features that suggest Mars once had running and standing water on its surface, as shown in Figure 1-7c. Each new discovery has raised new questions and areas for exploration.
A scientific law is a rule of nature that sums up related observations to describe a pattern in nature. For example, the law of conservation of charge states that in the various changes matter can undergo, the electric charge before and after stays the same. The law of reflection states that the angle of incidence for a light beam on a reflective surface equals the angle of reflection. Notice that the laws do not explain why these phenomena happen, they simply describe them.
A scientific theory is an explanation based on many observations supported by experimental results. Theories may serve as explanations for laws. A theory is the best available explanation of why things work as they do. For example, the theory of universal gravitation states that all the mass in the universe is attracted to other mass. Laws and theories may be revised or discarded over time, as shown in Figure 1-8. Notice that this use of the word theory is different from the common use, as in “I have a theory about why it takes longer to get to school on Fridays.” In scientific use, only a very well-supported explanation is called a theory.
| Greek philosophers proposed that objects fall because they seek their natural places. The more massive the object, the faster it falls. |
| ↓ Revision |
| Galileo showed that the speed at which an object falls depends on the amount of time it falls, not on its mass. |
| ↓ Revision |
| Galileo’s statement is true, but Newton revised the reason why objects fall. Newton proposed that objects fall because the object and Earth are attracted by a force. Newton also stated that there is a force of attraction between any two objects with mass. |
| ↓ Revision |
| Galileo’s and Newton’s statements still hold true. However, Einstein suggested that the force of attraction between two objects is due to mass causing the space around it to curve. |
|
Figure 1-8 Theories are changed and modified as new experiments provide insight and new observations are made. The theory of falling objects has undergone many revisions. |